Baroque Fictions or Metafictions? Coincidences and Boundaries Between Concepts to Think About Latin American Narratives
El Huevo Filosófico
PDF (Español)

Keywords

baroque
baroque fictions
metafictions
Carlos Gamerro
Linda Hutcheon barroco
ficciones barrocas
metaficciones
Carlos Gamerro
Linda Hutcheon

How to Cite

Torres Perdigón, A. “Baroque Fictions or Metafictions? Coincidences and Boundaries Between Concepts to Think About Latin American Narratives”. Universum (Talca. En línea), vol. 39, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 11-23, doi:10.4067/S0718-23762024000100011.

Abstract

Linked to the Spanish Golden Age, to the Hispanic tradition and the America’s colonization, baroque was a solid conceptual category to analyze artistic and literary practices by the end of the 20th Century. More recently, Carlos Gamerro tries to create a distinction between a baroque writing and what he calls “baroque fictions”: the former responds to some characteristics on the phrasal level, and the latter refers to narrative structures. However, this link between fictional and referential levels, the construction of mirrored levels, and the tensions between sing and reference or art and life are features related to another conceptual category well known in the 80’s and 90’s and that seems to have entered today into the literary theory vocabulary: metafiction. It is a concept related to modern literature and procedures that exhibit or reveal the artificial nature of literary fictions, to question what we consider real or fictive. This article explores how is the tension between these two categories, how relevant they are today in literary studies and what critical distance can we stablish in front of them in our contemporary literary and critical context.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-23762024000100011
PDF (Español)

References

Bakhtine, M. (2006). Esthétique et théorie du roman. Gallimard.

Berry, R. M. (2012). Metafiction. En J. Bray, A. Gibbons, & B. McHale (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (pp. 128–140). Routledge.

Deleuze, G. (1989). El pliegue. Leibniz y el barroco. Paidós.

Descola, P. (2010). Cognition, Perception and Worlding. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 35(3–4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801810X12772143410287

Descola, P. (2012). Más allá de naturaleza y cultura. Amorrortu.

Descola, P. (2014). Modes of being and forms of predication. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.012

Escobar, A. (2003). «Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo». El programa de investigación de modernidad/colonialidad latinoamericano. Tabula Rasa, 1, 51–86. https://cutt.ly/heu9TwbT

Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les choses, Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Gallimard.

Gamerro, C. (2010). Ficciones barrocas. Una lectura de Borges, Bioy Casares, Silvina Ocampo, Cortázar, Onetti y Felisberto Hernández. Eterna Cadencia.

Gass, W. (1970). Fiction and the Figures of Life. Nonpareilbooks.

Hamon, P. (1982). Un discours contraint. En G. Genette y T. Todorov (Eds.), Littérature et réalité (pp. 119-181). du Seuil.

Hutcheon, L. (1980). Narcissistic Narrative, the metafictional paradox. Wilfrid Laurier University.

Hutcheon, L. (2004). A Poetics of Postmodernism, History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358856

Jameson, F. (1972). The Prison-House of Language, A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214313

Lukács, G. (2005). La théorie du roman. Gallimard.

Marx, W. (2005). L’Adieu à la littérature, Histoire d’une dévalorisation XVIIIe-XXe siècle. de Minuit.

Sarduy, S. (1999). Obra Completa. ALLCA XX/Scipione Cultural.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2011). Petite écologie des études littéraires?: pourquoi et comment étudier la littérature?? T. Marchaisse.

Todorov, T. (2007). La littérature en péril. Flammarion.

Torres Perdigón, A. (2015). La littérature obstinée?: le roman chez Juan José Saer, Ricardo Piglia et Roberto Bolaño. Peter Lang.

Tynianov, I. (1969). Destruction, parodie. Change, 2, 67–76.

Watt, I. (1982). Réalisme et forme romanesque. En G. Genette y T. Todorov (Eds.), Littérature et réalité (pp. 11-46). du Seuil.

Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction, The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203131404

Wolf, W. (1990). Illusion and Breaking Illusion in Twentieth-Century Fiction. En F. Burwick & W. Pape (Eds.), Aesthetic Illusion, Theoretical and Historical Approaches. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884937.284

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.